The real cost hiding in your renewals

Over the last decade, many wholesale and equipment lenders have turned their loan management systems into “one‑of‑one” builds with custom screens, scripts, and integrations layered on top of Solifi, DataScan, or homegrown cores. It solved short‑term workflow gaps, but it also created a shadow system that has to be re-engineered every time the underlying platform moves—upgrades, roadmap shifts, or, now, major acquisitions like Solifi and DataScan.​

That is the custom dev death tax: paying once to build crucial capabilities, then paying again (and again) to keep them working as vendors change data models, APIs, and release patterns. The check is written in extra professional services, internal project time, and delayed modernization initiatives that never make it out of the backlog.​

How custom dev quietly becomes lock‑in

For most IT organizations, lock‑in did not start with contracts; it started with code. When legacy systems lacked robust APIs, teams did what they had to do—SFTP jobs, database views, bespoke middleware, and point‑to‑point integrations to connect the LMS with CRM, audit tools, title vendors, and core banking.​​

Each new requirement added another custom endpoint, another data transform, another exception workflow that only exists in your environment. Over time, those one‑off fixes become so entangled with daily operations that any talk of migration or even a “simple” version upgrade comes with a warning: expect significant rework, testing, and down‑time risk across all of those hooks.​​

Why Solifi x DataScan amplifies the problem

Solifi’s acquisition of DataScan promises an integrated, API‑driven wholesale and risk stack under a single Open Finance umbrella. For lenders, there are potential gains—one vendor boundary, tighter data flows between floorplan servicing and audits, unified reporting.​

But from a systems perspective, deeper suite integration also increases data gravity and switching costs. As Solifi folds DataScan’s capabilities into a broader platform, early phases will bring roadmap convergence, SKU reshuffling, and harmonization of identity and data models—all triggers that force you to revisit and re‑certify the custom logic surrounding your instance. If your uniqueness lives mainly in custom dev on top of these platforms, every change event becomes another tax event.​​

Where you’re already paying twice

The death tax tends to show up in three clusters of spend:

• Custom features that filled gaps in the core product—special funding flows, bespoke dealer hierarchies, risk dashboards—that now require rewrites or refactors to fit the new suite or data model.​
• Integration glue: file jobs, ESB mappings, and service layers that keep LMS, CRM, audit, title, and GL loosely in sync but have to be re‑mapped when schemas, authentication, or endpoints change.​
• Operational workarounds: Excel trackers, shared folders, and email‑based exception handling that your teams maintain alongside the “official” system and then have to rationalize again with each major upgrade or renewal.​

On paper, renewals look like license plus support. In practice, they often include a parallel line item of internal project cost and external services just to bring yesterday’s customizations forward into tomorrow’s environment.​

A different renewal strategy: orchestrate, don’t rebuild

Avoiding the next round of double‑spend is less about ripping out Solifi or DataScan and more about changing where your differentiation lives. Instead of embedding unique workflows inside a monolithic LMS, leading IT teams are standardizing them in an orchestration layer that sits above the core, exposes clean APIs, and treats the LMS as one of several interchangeable systems of record.​

That shift enables a different playbook:

• Inventory custom dev by domain (titles, audits, funding, risk) and refactor the highest‑value logic into configurable workflows and services that are vendor‑agnostic.​​
• Use the orchestration layer as the integration hub so CRM, dealer portals, audit providers, and title vendors all talk to one modern API surface, not directly to a legacy LMS.​
• Negotiate renewals with explicit data‑exit options, export guarantees, and minimal‑touch integration patterns, so you can adopt Solifi’s new modules where they fit without committing your entire architecture to one codebase.​

Lenders taking this approach have been able to deploy new modules such as title management and workflow UIs on top of existing loan systems in a matter of weeks, preserving uptime while cutting manual processing and avoiding a multi‑year re‑platform. In that world, the next big vendor acquisition or roadmap change is not a death tax—it is just another configuration change your platform can absorb.

‍