← All resources
Case study

AutoUse: replacing a legacy system without building one

AutoUse spent more than six months building its own dealer portal before concluding the build was the smaller half of the commitment. It stopped, and grew the portfolio more than 20% on the same headcount.

Case study
Independent lenders
6 pages

Every internal build is scoped on the wrong number. The delivery estimate gets scrutinized line by line, and the maintenance line gets a placeholder.

AutoUse, which has financed independent auto dealers across the Northeast for more than 50 years, had spent over six months building its own dealer portal when it reached that conclusion. Supporting, securing and enhancing a specialized lending platform is the part that recurs every year, and it competes for engineers rather than for budget.

It stopped building and went live on VeroOS in December 2025 as the system of record for its floor plan program: funding, curtailment tracking and repayment automated, dealer self service in place of a phone call, inventory level visibility and dealer performance monitoring with real time risk alerts. The portfolio has since grown by more than 20%, on the same headcount.

This case study covers the build versus buy decision, the process mapping that preceded implementation, and what actually happened at go live.

AutoUse: replacing a legacy system without building one
What you get
  • The four drivers that settled build versus buy, written out
  • How the process mapping exercise shaped the implementation
  • Operational outcomes after go live
  • What made the migration work, including what went wrong
Resource: AutoUse Case Study
Ungated
Get the PDF
Get the PDF
Something went wrong. Please try again.

The download starts straight away. We will also send you the occasional thing worth reading, and you can unsubscribe from any email.

Download the PDF

Thanks. Your download is ready.

Bring us the workflow that hurts most

Thirty minutes, one workflow, no slides. We will tell you where the time is going and whether it is worth changing.